28 September 2026 · 4 min read · AI visibility
Why Half the Field Is Invisible: This Week's AI Readiness Readings
With an average readiness of 59 across 11 brands, this week's Index shows a widening gap between the visible and the invisible — and the drinks and cigar trades are the proving ground.
By The Signal, by The AI Visibility Index
What does this week's data actually show?
This week the Index tracked 11 brands and returned an average readiness score of 59 out of 100. That number is the headline, and it deserves reading carefully. A score of 59 sits at the lower edge of "passable" — it means the typical brand on this week's board is roughly as likely to be overlooked by an AI assistant as it is to be cited.
Readiness measures how well a site is built to be found and quoted by ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. It is not a marketing vanity metric. It is a structural question: when an assistant assembles an answer, does your content surface as a source, or does a competitor's?
Who is leading — and by how much?
At the top of the table, The AI Visibility Index scores 87. Among the trading brands, The Whisky Shop leads on 76, followed by EGM Cigars on 66. Those three are the only names this week clearing the 65 mark that separates genuinely AI-ready sites from the merely competent.
The drop after that is steep. Hard To Find Whisky (57) and C.Gars Ltd (56) sit just below the average. City Cigars (50), The Drink Shop (48) and Turmeaus Cigars (32) fill out the lower half. The distance from The Whisky Shop's 76 to Turmeaus Cigars' 32 is 44 points — on a 100-point scale, that is the difference between being a default source and being effectively absent from AI-generated answers.
Why does a 44-point spread matter?
Because AI assistants do not return ten blue links. They return an answer, and that answer is built from a small handful of sources the model judges most authoritative and machine-readable. Visibility is winner-takes-most. A brand scoring in the mid-70s is not "a bit better" than one scoring in the low 30s; it is playing a different game entirely.
Consider the composition of this week's board. It is dominated by two adjacent categories — premium whisky and cigars. The Whisky Shop sits at 76 while Turmeaus Cigars sits at 32, and both compete for the attention of the same discerning, high-value customer. When a shopper asks an assistant where to buy a rare single malt or a boxed cigar, the brand with the higher readiness score is the one whose name gets spoken. The rest are, for practical purposes, invisible to that query.
Is the cigar trade being left behind?
The pattern in this week's readings is hard to ignore. EGM Cigars performs strongly at 66, but C.Gars Ltd (56), City Cigars (50) and Turmeaus Cigars (32) cluster in the lower band. Turmeaus Cigars, at 32, is this week's clearest example of a brand whose site is not structured to be understood by AI assistants — a score that low typically points to missing structured data, thin or hard-to-parse product content, and a lack of the citable, self-contained information models prefer.
Whisky retailers, by contrast, bracket the field: The Whisky Shop at the top of the trading brands and Hard To Find Whisky at 57. The lesson is not that one category is inherently more visible than another. It is that readiness is earned through structure, and that within any category the gap between the prepared and the unprepared is now measurable to the point.
What separates a 76 from a 32?
The short answer is machine-readability. High-scoring sites tend to present clear, well-structured product and brand information; consistent metadata; content that answers questions directly rather than burying answers in marketing prose; and technical foundations that let an assistant retrieve and trust what it finds. Low-scoring sites usually fail on the basics — content an AI cannot easily parse, cite or verify. The full breakdown of what we measure is set out in our methodology.
The encouraging part is that readiness is a fixable engineering problem, not a fixed brand attribute. A score of 32 is a starting position, not a sentence. The brands in this week's lower half — The Drink Shop at 48, City Cigars at 50 — are within reach of the average with focused work.
What should brands take from this week?
Three things. First, an average of 59 across the field means most brands still have significant ground to make up; being average is not being safe. Second, the leaders are pulling away — a 44-point spread from top to bottom shows the advantage compounds for those who act early. Third, category is no excuse: within both whisky and cigars this week, some brands scored well above 65 and others well below 50.
The wider trend behind these weekly readings is set out in the State of AI Visibility report. But the single most useful step is to know where your own site stands.
Run a scan and see your readiness score.